<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>관측성-아키텍처 on gnosyslambda&#39;s log</title>
    <link>https://gnosyslambda.github.io/tags/%EA%B4%80%EC%B8%A1%EC%84%B1-%EC%95%84%ED%82%A4%ED%85%8D%EC%B2%98/</link>
    <description>Recent content in 관측성-아키텍처 on gnosyslambda&#39;s log</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>ko-KR</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 17:42:13 +0900</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://gnosyslambda.github.io/tags/%EA%B4%80%EC%B8%A1%EC%84%B1-%EC%95%84%ED%82%A4%ED%85%8D%EC%B2%98/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>로그 관측성 아키텍처와 ClickHouse 선택 기준</title>
      <link>https://gnosyslambda.github.io/posts/2026-07-03-clickhouse-log-observability-architecture/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 17:42:13 +0900</pubDate>
      <guid>https://gnosyslambda.github.io/posts/2026-07-03-clickhouse-log-observability-architecture/</guid>
      <description>ClickHouse 기반 로그 저장소가 왜 관측성 스택의 대안으로 떠오르는지, 풀스택 관측성과 비교해 도입 조건과 운영 리스크를 정리합니다.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
